We know very little about gun theft or gun training, about gun storage or gun shop practices, about the effect of guns on college campuses or guns at work. The list goes on and on. The National Institutes of Health has funded little gun research.
The National Institute of Justice supports only a tiny amount. No one wants the hassle. This lack of funding hits hard in soft-money schools like ours. But the fact is, we also have a gun problem. Look at any other developed country. They do much better than we do at preventing gun violence.
What does the science say? Reporters are staying interested. Likely a result of such exposure, participants noted numerous skill deficits among the children and youth they serve who live in neighborhoods that have high rates of poverty and crime. As suggested by the research, many children experience problems with violence and aggression because they lack nonviolent conflict-resolution skills.
Much of this violence and aggression is further exacerbated by emotional overload from exposure to violence. Children and youth exposed to violence experience significant stress, and often struggle to identify and regulate their emotions, as a result of developmental impacts from their frequent exposure to trauma. Their emotions are often internalized and can later erupt in aggression and violence.
The Listening Session attendees also acknowledged that these skill deficits can be the result of children and youth learning behavior through observing and mimicking the actions of those around them.
When adults exhibit aggressive and violent behavior, such behavior is often interpreted as appropriate and acceptable. A cycle of violence starts when children and youth observe and embrace negative adult behaviors and, eventually, model such interactions with their own children. With much at stake, a laundry list of strategies and supports was offered to address the impact on child development and reduce the negative impact of exposure to violence. Participants lauded the importance of early, family-level prevention, suggesting that parents must be assisted in accessing the social services necessary to strengthen protective factors, build resiliency, help their children regulate their emotions, develop coping skills, and provide physical and psychological safety.
In addition to developing communication skills, children and youth need to be taught to identify and regulate their emotions; once they better understand their emotions and how they affect their behavior, they can learn how to appropriately respond to their feelings in ways that are not harmful to themselves or others. The Listening Session attendees recognized that until child and youth exposure to violence is eliminated, childhood mental health problems will likely continue to grow.
The group noted that they are witnessing dramatic growth in the number of children and youth with mental health problems, and that service providers must actively work to educate the public on childhood mental illness. Mental illness continues to be stigmatized, and public hesitancy to discuss the matter is detrimental to children and youth who are impacted by mental health problems.
It was further noted that many parents, teachers, and workers are often uneducated regarding mental health conditions and, as a result, fail to identify early signs of mental illness, delaying child and youth access to treatment.
It was pointed out that even once treatment is received and a diagnosis is given, many adults lack knowledge about specific mental illnesses and are unsure of how to interact with children and youth with a mental health problem.
In addition to reducing risk factors and developing protective factors and resiliency among youth currently suffering from mental health problems, professionals agreed that communities must also help children and youth at-risk of mental health problems develop protective factors to shield them from the negative mental health outcomes that frequently result from exposure to traumatic life events.
Preventing childhood exposure to violence and mitigating the impact of previous exposure is too large a job for any one group or organization. Child welfare, prevention, and mental health agencies cannot tackle this problem alone. Combating the negative impact of violence on children and youth requires the collaboration of teachers, principals, social workers, police officers, doctors, parents, friends, and more.
Each person has a role to play, be it screening for exposure to violence, mitigating the impact of violence through emotional support, or preventing violence through community activism and policy initiatives. While gun death data are the most reliable type of gun violence data currently available, it is important to recognize that gun deaths are only the tip of the iceberg of the gun violence epidemic.
In addition to gun deaths, many more people are shot and survive their injuries, are shot at but not hit, or witness gun violence. Many experience gun violence in other ways, for example by living in impacted communities, losing loved ones to gun violence, or being threatened with a gun.
Researchers need robust and reliable data to study and develop solutions to address the epidemic of gun violence in the United States. The NVDRS uses death certificates, police reports, and hospital records to report information about the victim, the cause of death, and the circumstances surrounding their death. To learn more, visit our page on nonfatal firearm injuries. The following data presented on this page focuses on the impact to those who were killed by gun violence.
Many Americans celebrate guns in our culture and disregard the inherent public safety issues that a gun-friendly culture creates. Gun ownership varies significantly by state. For example, one study found that gun ownership varies from More than 6 in 10 Americans believe that a gun in the home makes the family safer — a figure that has nearly doubled since It is about stopping gun violence in all its forms.
We must acknowledge that gun violence comes in many different forms — from gun suicide to police brutality to domestic violence to unintentional shootings to daily gun violence in neighborhoods across the country.
Every year, nearly 40, Americans are killed by guns, including: Though research shows that few individuals substitute means for suicide if their preferred method is not available, if firearms are not available, the person at risk for suicide is much more likely to survive even if they attempt using another method. Ninety percent of individuals who attempt suicide do not go on to die by suicide. To learn more, visit PreventFirearmSuicide. Gun ownership also has implications for the number of mass shootings in a state.
It will also have three to five more mass shootings per five years for every 10 unit increase in gun ownership. To learn more, visit our pages on firearm homicide or mass shootings.
In gun violence, examples include fatal injuries that occur when a weapon misfires or is mishandled by a child and results in the victim being shot in contrast with homicide and suicide, both of which involve an intent to pull the trigger and cause harm. Easy access to firearms, particularly unsecured firearms and the presence of firearms in risky situations, increases risk of unintentional injury and death by firearm.
Mitigating access with safer storage practices and through evidence-based policy prevents unintentional gun violence. To learn more, visit our page on unintentional shootings. In gun violence, these are also known as police-involved shootings. In addition to homicides, , people were injured by guns between and -- roughly 76, people a year, according to the CDC.
Brown told ABC News that every year on average 33, people are unintentionally shot. These include incidents where a gun goes off when someone thought it was unloaded, or a child was playing with a gun, according to Brown.
A report released in June by the U. The report said those costs are higher when factoring in longer-term costs such as follow-up visits and physical rehabilitation.
Webster said there is also another factor that's been difficult to quantify: the mental impact just from being threatened by a firearm. Even if no shots are fired, the mere sight of a handgun in front of a victim's face is enough to do serious damage to mental health, he said.
He added that intimidation is a major factor in domestic violence cases, particularly if the abusive partner is armed. Half of all suicide deaths in the U. Another 17, people were injured by a gun suicide attempt during that period, according to the CDC.
The majority of gun suicide victims are white men between the ages of 45 and Geographic data from the CDC showed that the gun suicides between and took place throughout the country and that in 39 states, the per capita suicide rate was greater than the per capita homicide rate.
In several states, such as Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee, the suicide rate was higher in rural counties. In a few locations, such as Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, both the gun suicide and gun homicide rate per , people was above Three states -- Arkansas, Alaska and Wyoming -- had rates of suicide higher than 15 per , people, according to CDC data.
A study by Everytown for Gun Safety , a nonprofit that advocates for gun control and gun safety, found the rate of firearm suicides was five times higher in rural communities than urban communities. Webster and other researchers added that the lack of media coverage on gun suicides has resulted in a lack of understanding of who is most affected by gun deaths.
Although health researchers acknowledge there is no single solution to stopping gun violence, Webster said there is some overlap among the different forms of gun violence and acknowledging those common threads is the first step to curbing shootings. They are typically planned events against some grievance," Webster said. A study released in May in Injury Epidemiology found in Access to a gun is more likely to lead a person to use it on more than just one person, Webster said.
0コメント